J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 5025
Joined: October 23rd, 2004, 12:21 am
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Randall » June 19th, 2016, 3:54 pm

What a terrible, freak thing.

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18088
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » June 19th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Oh gosh, that's so sad.

Animated Views Staff
Animated Views Staff
Posts: 5123
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Dacey » June 20th, 2016, 5:07 pm

"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

Animated Views Staff
Animated Views Staff
Posts: 5123
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Dacey » August 10th, 2018, 10:45 pm

This would be quite upsetting if true...

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/9 ... -hemsworth
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18088
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » August 11th, 2018, 3:58 am

It’s negotiating tactics. But unfair on Paramount's side: when they restructured their deals for the third film, a bunch of them took essentially a pay cut already to do three for less and a fourth for more later. Now they want to do the fourth but don’t want to pay what they set in a deal! And there’s no way the third lost money if they’re making a fourth...that doesn’t happen. I have a feeling that everyone'll be back...Paramount know that the film won’t make a dime without the Chrises (Pine in particular) and will fold eventually to honor they very contract they offered back on the third film.

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 5025
Joined: October 23rd, 2004, 12:21 am
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Randall » August 11th, 2018, 8:55 am

Yeah, it's either they get Pine or forget the whole thing. Poor form on Panny's part.

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18088
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » August 11th, 2018, 7:35 pm

Um...Panny? ;)

It’s Paramount, not Panasonic (which *does* get affectionately known as Panny in certain tech circles)! :)

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 5025
Joined: October 23rd, 2004, 12:21 am
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Randall » August 11th, 2018, 7:47 pm

I had just woken up. Though, part of me knew that something was off!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 2952
Joined: September 27th, 2007, 3:06 pm

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby EricJ » August 12th, 2018, 12:47 am

Ben wrote:Um...Panny? ;)

It’s Paramount, not Panasonic (which *does* get affectionately known as Panny in certain tech circles)! :)


Haven't heard anyone gripe about "Panny" since Avatar was taken "hostage" during the Blu-ray 3D days! :lol:

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18088
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » August 12th, 2018, 5:34 am

Perhaps in consumer circles, Eric...

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 7618
Joined: October 25th, 2004, 9:53 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby ShyViolet » September 23rd, 2018, 2:30 pm

WatchMojo video about the best TOS/TNG/Abrams Trek films...

https://youtu.be/XtoQxHFLWoI


Basically, they twice mix up footage from different TOS films (ie: Kirk’s eulogy from 2 as part of 3).
"It is written among the limitless constellations of the celestial heavens, and in the depths of the emerald seas....the world which we see is an outward and visible dream of an inward and invisible reality."