J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 4972
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 11:21 pm
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Randall » June 19th, 2016, 2:54 pm

What a terrible, freak thing.

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18024
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 1:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » June 19th, 2016, 3:03 pm

Oh gosh, that's so sad.

Animated Views Staff
Animated Views Staff
Posts: 5079
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Dacey » June 20th, 2016, 4:07 pm

"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

Animated Views Staff
Animated Views Staff
Posts: 5079
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Dacey » August 10th, 2018, 9:45 pm

This would be quite upsetting if true...

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/9 ... -hemsworth
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18024
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 1:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » August 11th, 2018, 2:58 am

It’s negotiating tactics. But unfair on Paramount's side: when they restructured their deals for the third film, a bunch of them took essentially a pay cut already to do three for less and a fourth for more later. Now they want to do the fourth but don’t want to pay what they set in a deal! And there’s no way the third lost money if they’re making a fourth...that doesn’t happen. I have a feeling that everyone'll be back...Paramount know that the film won’t make a dime without the Chrises (Pine in particular) and will fold eventually to honor they very contract they offered back on the third film.

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 4972
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 11:21 pm
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Randall » August 11th, 2018, 7:55 am

Yeah, it's either they get Pine or forget the whole thing. Poor form on Panny's part.

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18024
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 1:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » August 11th, 2018, 6:35 pm

Um...Panny? ;)

It’s Paramount, not Panasonic (which *does* get affectionately known as Panny in certain tech circles)! :)

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 4972
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 11:21 pm
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Randall » August 11th, 2018, 6:47 pm

I had just woken up. Though, part of me knew that something was off!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 2930
Joined: September 27th, 2007, 2:06 pm

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby EricJ » August 11th, 2018, 11:47 pm

Ben wrote:Um...Panny? ;)

It’s Paramount, not Panasonic (which *does* get affectionately known as Panny in certain tech circles)! :)


Haven't heard anyone gripe about "Panny" since Avatar was taken "hostage" during the Blu-ray 3D days! :lol:

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18024
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 1:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek"

Postby Ben » August 12th, 2018, 4:34 am

Perhaps in consumer circles, Eric...