Disney's Frozen

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
EricJ
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 5212
Joined: September 27th, 2007, 3:06 pm

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by EricJ »

Also, Rapunzel, like Snow Queen, was a mess of abandoned storyboards during the Eisner administration, until the new Lasseter crew just darned the torpedoes, went forward with a "funny" rom-com/fairytale script to get it finished (although still some touches of the "teen comedy" Unbraided scripts), and slapped the "Enchanted" style adjective title on it, since that was the last movie to save Disney's bacon.

And worked out pretty well. From what I've read, the previous attempts to do Snow Queen were painfully off the point of the original story, so if this's as close as they're ever going to get to it, it's...not too bad, really. :)
User avatar
TitusTodd
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 11th, 2009, 1:59 pm
Location: St. George, UT

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by TitusTodd »

The only thing I didn't like from the trailer was the snowman. Seems out of place. Not only does he/it seem unnecessary but the character design is odd and doesn't go with the feel of the rest of the character designs.

Sure, Frozen became a possibility again because of the success of Tangled but I can't blame Disney for that. It is important to make successful movies. So, seeing how Tangled succeeded, give Frozen another shot. I just don't want Disney to get stuck in similar formulas. Wreck-it-Ralph was definitely a different movie and successful one at that so it shows different formulas can work and should be employed.
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6784
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Dacey »

Not sure why so many people are hating Olaf. He looks like a traditional Disney sidekick from what I can see. And, even more importantly, he seems funny.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
EricJ
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 5212
Joined: September 27th, 2007, 3:06 pm

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by EricJ »

From what fans saw at the D23, Olaf also gets a funny song (and appropriate subplot) about what he plans to do on his sunny summer vacation, once the freeze-curse is broken...Seems no one told him the cold truth.
(Obvious hints of Ray the Firefly from P&tF, but I don't even remember what happened to him.)
User avatar
Randall
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7510
Joined: October 23rd, 2004, 12:21 am
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Randall »

The problem is... I often don't like the Dinsey comedic sidekicks. They can work (Beauty and The Beast), but too often they threaten to spoil a good film (Mushu, the Gargoyles). This Frozen character just doesn't seem to fit in the movie.
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6784
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Dacey »

Whoa! Hang on just a minute there!

Respect the Mushu, bro.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
User avatar
Randall
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7510
Joined: October 23rd, 2004, 12:21 am
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Randall »

Sorry, dude. Jive-talkin' Mushu is just one step above Rosie O'Donnell's Brooklyn ape girl.
Bill1978
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1220
Joined: July 9th, 2008, 4:53 am
Location: Australia

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Bill1978 »

I have faith that Olaf will fit in with the movie. I admit that while he seems out of place character design wise, the bits and pieces I've read around on the net justifies why he appears like that, and I do believe he will be integrately seamlessly into the plot as opposed to some of the other shoehorned sidekicks.
User avatar
ShyViolet
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9120
Joined: October 25th, 2004, 9:53 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by ShyViolet »

It's a lot jokier than I thought it was going to be; I thought there would be a more "epic" feeling. The snowman definitely contributes to this, and so does the "mismatched couple go on an adventure and fall in love" thing. :? Disney films are definitely on an upswing but there's still that cutesy, safe feel of Bolt, Princess, etc.....Hope they let Disney make an "Inside Out" type film so we can finally herald the second Renaissance.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
User avatar
TitusTodd
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 11th, 2009, 1:59 pm
Location: St. George, UT

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by TitusTodd »

I hope you are right, Bill1978. I just can't imagine how at this point but I will see the movie and know for sure.

Mulan without Mushu? Can't imagine it. His character design fit good in movie and he had an important role to play.
User avatar
Randall
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7510
Joined: October 23rd, 2004, 12:21 am
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Randall »

Mulan needed Mushu. But he didn't have to sound like he was from Detroit. I didn't mind him all that much, though.
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25966
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by Ben »

Detroit? Sounded like a talking donkey to me... ;)
User avatar
TitusTodd
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 11th, 2009, 1:59 pm
Location: St. George, UT

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by TitusTodd »

Actually, the talking donkey sounded like a talking dragon to me. :)
gaastra
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 2912
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 3:40 pm

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by gaastra »

It's a lot jokier than I thought it was going to be; I thought there would be a more "epic" feeling. The snowman definitely contributes to this, and so does the "mismatched couple go on an adventure and fall in love" thing. Disney films are definitely on an upswing but there's still that cutesy, safe feel of Bolt, Princess, etc.....Hope they let Disney make an "Inside Out" type film so we can finally herald the second Renaissance.
Didn't see the leaked storybook pages huh? This film gets dark near the end. It's not as cute as disney is making it out to be. There are alot of emotions.

It's like the iron giant trailer where they only showed the comedy parts. That movie was more then a comedy. This is the same.
User avatar
ShyViolet
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9120
Joined: October 25th, 2004, 9:53 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY

Re: Disney's Frozen (formerly Snow Queen) 2013

Post by ShyViolet »

Cool, that's good to know. :)
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
Post Reply