Them's some pointy starfish!
But I'll defer to your eyes, since you have the laserdisc handy.
And I agree that the pose looks really akward on that bathing beauty without a chest. Why exactly is she pushing out that flat chest of hers?
Search found 261 matches
- January 30th, 2006, 4:34 pm
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
- January 30th, 2006, 12:33 pm
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
- January 30th, 2006, 1:40 am
- Forum: At the Movies
- Topic: Tangled (formerly Rapunzel)
- Replies: 1287
- Views: 759360
- January 30th, 2006, 1:34 am
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Which Oscar-winning animated film is the best?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12717
- January 29th, 2006, 11:26 pm
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
FWIW, I don't find it sexist to have male characters attracted to female characters. Romantic or beauty-attraction is a fact of life. It's not sexist. It's not even sexual unless you want to see it that way. Look at Rex and Slinky and Ham as just being Twitterpaited about Barbie. Dropped jaws is not...
- January 29th, 2006, 10:26 pm
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
- January 27th, 2006, 2:14 am
- Forum: At the Movies
- Topic: Tangled (formerly Rapunzel)
- Replies: 1287
- Views: 759360
- January 26th, 2006, 7:52 pm
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
- January 26th, 2006, 7:18 pm
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
Here's one of the most informative articles about the aspects of this deal. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060127/media_nm/media_pixar_disney_dc;_ylt=AigC__sgG311gy8Tf_GnqEpxFb8C;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA-- Pixar's "brain trust" of seven directors and creative executives were also listed as ...
- January 26th, 2006, 2:47 am
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
This is interesting.... I always appreciate Jim's objective viewpoint. :) http://www.jimhillmedia.com/article.php?id=1821 In any case, does this mean that projects like "Rapunzel" are going to be flushed down the toilet now? Exactly what Jim is asking. They cancled Toy Story 3 so...who knows. :? He...
- January 26th, 2006, 2:22 am
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
They can't make any sequel without somebody complaining about it. I believe they started making "midquels" because they were getting complaints that their sequels were focusing on the offspring of main characters from original movies. Yeah, that freaky one they made with Lilo and Stitch's daughter ...
- January 25th, 2006, 2:35 pm
- Forum: At the Movies
- Topic: Ratatouille
- Replies: 1254
- Views: 797793
- January 25th, 2006, 12:42 am
- Forum: Outside the Lines
- Topic: Disney Pixar Discussion
- Replies: 609
- Views: 344499
- January 20th, 2006, 3:43 am
- Forum: At the Movies
- Topic: Fantasia
- Replies: 187
- Views: 85949
- January 19th, 2006, 2:55 pm
- Forum: At the Movies
- Topic: Chicken Little
- Replies: 543
- Views: 309084
I still think that when Disney broke of pixar they were using CL to see whether they can stand on there own 2 feet, not really to be better but to see if they can make it. I don't know, but I expect it was the opposite: "See if WDFA can still compete or if we should shut it down and just buy Pixar....