Harry Potter

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
Animated Views Staff
Animated Views Staff
Posts: 5353
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Re: Harry Potter

Post by Dacey » November 11th, 2016, 7:25 pm

Yates confirmed for entire Fantastic Beasts series...for better or for worse...

http://www.avclub.com/article/diretor-d ... pot-245804
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3176
Joined: September 27th, 2007

Re: Harry Potter

Post by EricJ » November 12th, 2016, 1:10 am

Dacey wrote:Yates confirmed for entire Fantastic Beasts series...for better or for worse...
For hit or for flop...For series or for single...Till death does it part. :roll:

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 6822
Joined: October 16th, 2004
Contact:

Re: Harry Potter

Post by James » November 18th, 2016, 11:16 pm

Just saw Fantastic Beasts. Quick review:

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 5290
Joined: October 23rd, 2004
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: Harry Potter

Post by Randall » November 19th, 2016, 8:40 am

That's the feeling I got from the trailer.

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18589
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Harry Potter

Post by Ben » November 19th, 2016, 9:42 am

It's been getting very positive comments here, which surprised me since I was kind of feeling the same. I was just about to get excited at the good notices I've been reading, but good to have a check on expectations!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 558
Joined: October 18th, 2007

Re: Harry Potter

Post by gaastra » November 20th, 2016, 3:11 pm

Fantastic beasts did well at the box office with 75m! Good news it's a hit with adults. Bad news it's a bust with kids! Looks like the early fear that not having kid or teen main heroes would hurt the film was right! Only 18% of the people seeing the film are kids! Ouch!
Topping the weekend box office, WB's Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them delivered an estimated $75 million, matching industry expectations while falling below BoxOfficeMojo's lofty projections, which banked too heavily on not only the Harry Potter fanbase, but a new group of younger moviegoers. As it turns out, only 18% of the opening weekend audience was under the age of 18 while 55% was over the age of 35, which suggests previous Harry Potter fans showed up, but the new generation wasn't quite as inspired.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=4243&p=.htm

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3176
Joined: September 27th, 2007

Re: Harry Potter

Post by EricJ » November 20th, 2016, 5:46 pm

gaastra wrote:Fantastic beasts did well at the box office with 75m! Good news it's a hit with adults. Bad news it's a bust with kids! Looks like the early fear that not having kid or teen main heroes would hurt the film was right! Only 18% of the people seeing the film are kids! Ouch!
Technically, that's probably because of the Myth of Friday Numbers--Parents usually take their kids on weekends.

But yeah, this thing was so front-loaded it couldn't stand up straight. Warner, of course, thought they had this BO weekend before it even opened, and got to work on The Next Five, but I was hoping for that surprise dropoff, since all the pilgrimage-weekend fans got their wish from the poster, but in the end, Nobody Really Cares About Side Stories.
(Or as I put it, "Shakespeare never wrote a play about Rosencrantz & Guildenstern...Tom Stoppard wrote a play about how nobody cared what happened to Rosencrantz & Guildenstern.")
I was hoping to blog about it over the weekend, but looks like I may have to wait for the second weekend's numbers before getting a chance to gloat.

Animated Views Staff
Animated Views Staff
Posts: 5353
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Re: Harry Potter

Post by Dacey » November 20th, 2016, 6:04 pm

For what it's worth, I found Fantastic Beasts to be quite fun. David Yates perhaps seemed to be holding it back some, but this is easily the lightest he's been on his feet with the franchise so far. And the four leads were extremely charming and likable.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

User avatar
Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 18589
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Harry Potter

Post by Ben » November 21st, 2016, 4:30 am

EricJ wrote:Warners got to work on The Next Five...
The next four.

Animated Views Admin
Animated Views Admin
Posts: 6822
Joined: October 16th, 2004
Contact:

Re: Harry Potter

Post by James » November 21st, 2016, 8:47 am

Ben wrote:
EricJ wrote:Warners got to work on The Next Five...
The next four.
Yeah, don't give them any ideas!
Dacey wrote:For what it's worth, I found Fantastic Beasts to be quite fun. David Yates perhaps seemed to be holding it back some, but this is easily the lightest he's been on his feet with the franchise so far. And the four leads were extremely charming and likable.
click to reveal content
Meh: not bad, but not great. Four main characters were fun. Effects were cool. But the story was just not there - very amateurish and cliched! (The scene at the speakeasy encapsulates the problems with the story.)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 7821
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Re: Harry Potter

Post by ShyViolet » June 5th, 2018, 4:18 am

Kinda random I know, but just happened to come across this...it’s the letter J.K. Rowling sent to Daniel Radcliffe when he was cast as Harry:


https://news.clickhole.com/amazing-this ... 1825121407


:)
"That’s right, folks, it’s gonna be a Meg episode, stick around for the fun.
Here’s the clicker...no one’d blame ya.”

Post Reply