Ice Age

Post by **Dacey** » October 21st, 2007, 1:31 pm

I wouldn't know. I only heard it in "The Simpsons Movie" also.

Post by **Daniel** » October 22nd, 2007, 3:41 am

I don't know either, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was true.

Post by **Dacey** » December 12th, 2007, 4:34 pm

Here's some news on the sequel (plus information on "Night at the Museum 2", which is actually happening):

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/night_a ... s/1696700/

Post by **Foxtale** » December 12th, 2007, 4:42 pm

Was there also news that there is going to be a Robots 2? I think I'm mistaken though. Whatever.

I'm not looking forward to the third movie as much as I'm looking forward to Horton Hears a Who. ^.^ I think that there is a chance though that it might be better than the second one, I'm just not sure because it's the same set of characters. *shrugs* But I would need more details to start forming a semi-real opinion.

Post by **Dacey** » December 12th, 2007, 4:55 pm

I'm kinda upset that Queen Latifah is returning.

Post by **Ben** » December 12th, 2007, 5:08 pm

I haven't heard anything about a Robots 2. Gawd, I hope not.

Fair dos to them on Ice Age...it's the franchise that keeps Blue Sky ticking (like Pixar's Toy Stories and DreamWorks' Dreck), and I still maintain that you can keep your Donkeys and Buzz Lightyears...Scrat is the single best character personality to emerge from the whole CG bang.

I don't expect IA3 to be as good as Horton, but if it'll be well intentioned, no mean fun, then why not? The Ice Ages are not as smart and talky as the Shreks nor as warm and cosy as the Toy Stories.

And as I've said before, I think Blue Sky are perhaps Pixar's nearest rivals...they'll be at home with these characters and it should be a more than adequate outing, even if it's nothing special. Put it frankly, I don't think Ice Age 3 will resemble Shrek 3...

Post by **Dacey** » December 12th, 2007, 5:15 pm

Fair dos to them on Ice Age...it's the franchise that keeps Blue Sky ticking (like Pixar's Toy Stories and DreamWorks' Dreck)

Nice.

Post by **Daniel** » December 12th, 2007, 5:45 pm

Indeed and agreed about Scrat!... though, I feel like I've said that before.

What was your issue with Robots, Ben? I thought the story was so-so, but it was to darn busy!

Post by **Ben** » December 12th, 2007, 6:06 pm

Yeah, pretty much the same. Robots looked great, but it was overly busy and whenever I think about that film it just equates a big noise in my head.

Wendy's Jane wrote:
DreamWorks' Dreck
Nice.

Thanks, thought you'd like that. If you mouth it right, it actually works!

Post by **Dacey** » March 9th, 2008, 11:25 am

Okay, now I'm worried:

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/showestnews.php?id=42754

Post by **Foxtale** » March 9th, 2008, 11:34 am

Dinosaurs? Interesting, I'm sure it can't be that bad but after this it might be time to put the series down lol.

Post by **vveksuvarna** » March 9th, 2008, 11:50 am

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo....

i was hoping they dont cash on the 1st sucess again...

now that is certain...i jus hope they make it good...

Post by **Meg** » March 9th, 2008, 3:14 pm

That...does not make any sense. At all.

And I know that's a low-quality photo and everything, but wow, that T-Rex looks a lot like Tiny from Meet The Robinsons!

Post by **Daniel** » March 9th, 2008, 4:06 pm

Yes, a little too close for comfort.

And a T-Rex head isn't that big! Of course, it could just be for the poster.

However, I do like the title, even if it makes you think "wait, how are dinosaurs around?". Time travel, possibly?

Edit: updated thread title.

Post by **K3vin** » March 9th, 2008, 4:19 pm

Better quality :