Shrek

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 29
Joined: May 8th, 2007
Location: Netherlands/Belgium
Contact:

Post by wendy » May 10th, 2007, 4:16 am

Maybe puss in boots was castrated for domestic use, hence the exrta weight ;-)

Don't you also think arthur and prince charming look a lot like each other, especially if you see these posters next to each other?

ImageImage

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25329
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » May 10th, 2007, 5:36 am

Good catch...I wonder if there's something they're not telling us? ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » May 10th, 2007, 6:49 am

I noticed that a while ago as well.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 29
Joined: May 8th, 2007
Location: Netherlands/Belgium
Contact:

Post by wendy » May 10th, 2007, 7:17 am

Ben wrote:Good catch...I wonder if there's something they're not telling us? ;)
I see :shock:

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 227
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: Paris
Contact:

Post by Kinoo » May 10th, 2007, 8:40 am

Yeah, TOO MUCH alike. That's the Dreamworks design originality I guess...
[url=http://www.pixar-room.com][img]http://pixarroom.free.fr/PIXAR%20PICS/mai2007/R.jpg[/img][/url]
http://www.inbedwithkinoo.canalblog.com

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » May 10th, 2007, 2:13 pm

Well, if they turn out to be related or something, it would make sense...

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25329
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » May 10th, 2007, 5:50 pm

That's what I'm thinking they haven't told us...

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 241
Joined: April 24th, 2006

Post by YCougar » May 11th, 2007, 5:15 pm

Y'know, if this thing fails it certainly won't be for insufficient advertising, like Meet the Robinsons or TMNT... Shrek the Third is everywhere I go! Props to their marketing department, at least. :P
[img]http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a388/ninja_otter/SKsignature.jpg[/img]

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25329
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » May 12th, 2007, 8:19 am

They are pretty desperate. Without Shrek outgunning all other animation, DWs loses their powerhouse franchise and would be ripe for dismantling or selling off.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9048
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » May 13th, 2007, 12:01 am

In an interview JK said they came very close to starting an OTH sequel but decided not to.

Kinda sad 'cause out of all the DW films (including Shrek) I really think OTH is one of the few that actually could benefit from a sequel. There's still lots more places they can go, IMHO.


With Shrek....really hard for me to say this, 'cause I love DW and I still do love Shrek. But I really think they should have stopped at 2...or even 1 for that matter. They said everything they needed to say about beauty in the eye of the beholder and whatnot. That was the theme. Other than that, all you have left is the fairy tale spoof.


Not that I won't enjoy Shrek 3 and all....'course I'll see it, at least once. (saw Shrek 2 twice in 2004 :wink:, with different friends)


It was a mistake to make Shrek the DW mascot. Shrek is lovable 'cause he's anything BUT a tool! This is just such a huge contradiction of that whole "Leave me alone in my swamp" guy we saw in part 1.


I still love Shrek, love DW, but enough already.


:wink:
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25329
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » May 13th, 2007, 7:50 am

The thing I find odd about Shrek becoming a figurehead is that he's <I>not even DreamWorks' creation</I>.

They really need to find a character that works as the true "face" of DWs, but Shrek ain't it. It would have been great if First Flight had been an earlier short...they could have used the little blue bird from that as an extremely cute little logo character, perched on the end of their regular lettering. They could still do it, actually, and put a warm face to what is essentially pretty hard block lettering.

I think Shrek 2 is valid...it continued the story to a certain degree that added and tied up the characters' true feelings and put closure on the story arc. Shrek 3 now <I>feels</I> like a sequel, being made purely for the money, and as I said with Spidey, dragging it out to anything past this will no doubt be creatively bankrupt. But then, if Shrek 3 don't sell, we won't get a fourth, because that's the way it works...

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9048
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » May 14th, 2007, 6:36 am

They really need to find a character that works as the true "face" of DWs

Hammy would be better IMHO. Even though he's part of the comic strip OTH....still, I think he would be cute. :wink:
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25329
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » May 14th, 2007, 6:38 am

They need an <I>original</I> creation!!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9048
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » May 14th, 2007, 6:38 am

I know. :(
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1
Joined: May 14th, 2007

What is an Ogre Baby???

Post by Martian » May 14th, 2007, 7:45 am

Can someone tell me what an Ogre Baby is???? http://www.ogrebabies.com

Post Reply