Official Star Wars Thread

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 719
Joined: April 8th, 2020

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Farerb » February 25th, 2023, 5:04 am

‘The Mandalorian’ Has No Ending Planned, Says Jon Favreau: ‘It’s Not Like There’s a Finale That We’re Building To’
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/the-ma ... 235534624/

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25335
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Ben » February 25th, 2023, 6:25 am

Oh, joy. So it will just keep running, filling in time before it peters out and just ends without any kind of build up or satisfying resolution.

Didn’t Disney learn anything from the sequels not having a plan…!?

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10012
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Daniel » February 25th, 2023, 2:43 pm

The Meanderlorian.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1212
Joined: July 9th, 2008
Location: Australia

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Bill1978 » February 25th, 2023, 4:40 pm

Ben wrote:
February 25th, 2023, 6:25 am
Oh, joy. So it will just keep running, filling in time before it peters out and just ends without any kind of build up or satisfying resolution.

Didn’t Disney learn anything from the sequels not having a plan…!?
Didn't Disney learn from Lost? Which meandered for years until the showrunners decided to end it and then in course corrected as it had an end in sight and wasn't just spinning wheels for the sake of spinning wheels.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25335
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Ben » February 25th, 2023, 8:53 pm

Well Lost was interesting since they did have a plan! The idea was three seasons, but then it became a huge hit and partway through Season 2 they realised it was going to run past three years. So S2 became a lot of filler, S3 was basically what S2 *should* have been, and then S4 was more filler, which basically killed it. It probably would have continued behind that, but by then audiences were all filler'd out and just wanted resolutions. It’s very roughly speaking, since of course stories overlapped and changed give the in-flux nature of the filler, but S5 became what S3 would have been, but by then it was too late and too many viewers had been, er, lost. So there *was* a plan, but the economics of success got the meddlers involved and spun it out of control. And, no, Disney clearly did not learn from this! :)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10012
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Daniel » March 3rd, 2023, 3:20 pm

Teaser for the documentary about the infamous Holiday Special:


User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25335
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Ben » March 4th, 2023, 4:25 am

Oh, cool! This might finally give the special itself a reason to exist! ;)

If Disney was smart, they’d totally own this and buy it for D+. I’m not saying to make the special itself available (I don’t think certain things will happen until a certain maker is no longer with us), but this would be a good way to see it represented and for them to acknowledge and accept it happened, while keeping the mystery and "what IS this thing?" feel (which, to be honest, you still have after you’ve seen it anyway)!

(Bit cheeky of the trailer to suggest the above image itself comes from the special, though. There’s a few clips in there that are illustrative of bad 70s SW spoofs, not the special itself. Apparently there will be actual clips in the doc itself, but just clarifying we don’t get dancing stormtroopers! Although what there is is much, much worse…!) ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9050
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by ShyViolet » March 6th, 2023, 10:46 am

Happy Life Day!! :)
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25335
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Ben » March 6th, 2023, 12:33 pm

May the farce be with you! ;)

AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7270
Joined: October 23rd, 2004
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Randall » April 7th, 2023, 8:40 pm

A new Rey series?!?!? Could it possibly make up for the sequels?!?

https://www.starwars.com/news/swce-2023 ... wars-films
https://people.com/movies/star-wars-dai ... skywalker/

Plus, Dave Filoni to direct a film to close off the Rebels/Ahsoka story. That actually should be good.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 459
Joined: May 24th, 2021

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by GeffreyDrogon » April 7th, 2023, 9:34 pm

The Rey trilogy is probably going to bomb harder than Solo.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1212
Joined: July 9th, 2008
Location: Australia

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Bill1978 » April 7th, 2023, 11:09 pm

Apart from Andor Season 2 - the news of a Rey film is the only thing on the Stars Wars horizon that I would be interested in watching.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25335
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Ben » April 8th, 2023, 3:21 am

Not sure where that has come from, but currently this is just one Rey film, not a trilogy. The two other films of this new three film announcement are unconnected. I guess if it does well we could see more, but it’s just one Rey film at the moment.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 5199
Joined: September 27th, 2007

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by EricJ » April 8th, 2023, 4:16 am

GeffreyDrogon wrote:
April 7th, 2023, 9:34 pm
The Rey trilogy is probably going to bomb harder than Solo.
No, Solo bombed because the idea of making "filler" SW movies for literally no other reason than December placeholders during non-Episode years was doomed from the start. Even if you liked Rogue One.
Oh, and yeah, it was goofy too. And, as one critic put it, the script that "read like a filmed Wikipedia page" :lol: didn't do much to live down the "No reason to exist" first argument.

In Rey's case, it's basically recognizing that we liked the character, and she deserved a better break than the tough mess she was handed in the Trilogy Gone Wrong.
Do-overs are always welcome, and those with a little foresight going in about what they actually want to DO with the character can only be an improvement.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25335
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Official Star Wars Thread

Post by Ben » April 8th, 2023, 7:45 pm

The Lord/Miller version of Solo was so much more fun than what we got.

It bombed because Iger got greedy and put it out six months too early, which wasn’t much more than just six months after the last one, which no one liked anyway and left a sour taste for SW fans. Had we had more of a break and felt more like Christmas was the new time to receive the gift of Star Wars, I still think Solo would have made at least half as much again.

Post Reply