Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » May 1st, 2019, 4:45 pm
We have our first look:
I suppose they look the part, Lady more so. Feels weird as usual.
Unlike
Lion King or
Jungle Book, these are REAL dogs, so there's that... I'm thinking their "voices" will be in the form of voice overs.
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 5206
- Joined: September 27th, 2007
Post
by EricJ » May 1st, 2019, 5:49 pm
Oh, look, Lady & Benji!
Daniel wrote: ↑May 1st, 2019, 4:45 pm
Unlike
Lion King or
Jungle Book, these are REAL dogs, so there's that... I'm thinking their "voices" will be in the form of voice overs.
Or the CGI-enhanced mouths that the studio beat to death during the late 90's/early-00's, qv. "Underdog", "Beverly Hills Chihuaua".
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 9113
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » May 1st, 2019, 7:11 pm
Oh God.
Please tell me this is really some Saturday Night Live sketch!

You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 7482
- Joined: October 23rd, 2004
- Location: SaskaTOON, Canada
Post
by Randall » May 1st, 2019, 11:45 pm
I guess that Lady's okay, but is that the closest they could come to finding a dog that looked like Tramp?
Whatever. The whole thing is pointless anyhow.
Disney+ gets less appealing every day.
-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 25904
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » May 2nd, 2019, 12:39 am
...he says as he gets suckered in for the Willow series...

-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 7482
- Joined: October 23rd, 2004
- Location: SaskaTOON, Canada
Post
by Randall » May 2nd, 2019, 11:51 pm
We'll see. Willow's still a long way from happening.
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » May 3rd, 2019, 6:27 pm
Here's a look at the logo:
The original was beautiful and inspired, this looks pretty hollow. Like the movie will no doubt feel.

-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 25904
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » May 4th, 2019, 4:05 am
First new logo I’ve seen where the Disney is almost as big as the title!
And shouldn’t that be Disney+ for a streaming original? Guess they dint want to differentiate l especially as this may get a Euro cinema release before + is available here.
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » May 5th, 2019, 12:16 pm
Ben wrote: ↑May 4th, 2019, 4:05 am
And shouldn’t that be Disney+ for a streaming original?
Or how about D
+sney?

-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 7482
- Joined: October 23rd, 2004
- Location: SaskaTOON, Canada
Post
by Randall » May 6th, 2019, 11:53 pm
Sigh.
The only thing that offends me anymore is people telling me I should be offended by something. Y'know?
-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 25904
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » May 7th, 2019, 4:08 am
Don’t worry...you won’t be offended by the cats in the original anymore either. No doubt they’ll be joining Dumbo's crows in the "no longer appropriate" pile...
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 9113
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » May 7th, 2019, 6:52 pm
Wow. I mean—WOW.
I understand that many might be offended by these images, but that was a different time and the Siamese cats are a VITAL part of the story.
Regardless of how you feel about him, Walt Disney was a singular genius who (with the help of of other brilliant artists) not only transformed the medium of film, but American and eventually worldwide media culture as a whole. You really can’t overestimate the impact he had as an individual.
It is just so wrong to be butchering these films. Thanks, Iger.

You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » May 11th, 2019, 3:03 pm
From that same article:
Variety wrote:There’s also a possibility Wondaland will do a pass on the film’s signature song “He’s A Tramp,” another individual added.
Shame if they do.
Just don't take away Joe and Tony, per favore?

-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 9113
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » May 11th, 2019, 6:47 pm
Oh right, I guess it’s because Tramp is kind of a “womanizer”, and Peggy sings about how she loves and needs him regardless? Yeah, I can definitely see how
that’s offensive. I mean why should
any character in a Disney film be three-dimensional and nuanced? I simply can’t even imagine how damaged little girls who’d watch this scene of the film would be. (If they even understand what it’s about in the first place. I didn’t.

)
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!