Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6636
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Dacey » April 13th, 2023, 2:39 pm

I just wish that JKR weren’t involved in this at all. She’s kind of blown her reputation in a huge way over the last few years.

And this isn’t like Golden Compass where the series came after a box office failure. Everyone has watched these films and knows the story. How is it going to pull off weekly cliffhangers?

And as an aside, who on earth is telling Zaslav that “Max” is a good name?!?!
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 8207
Joined: October 16th, 2004
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by James » April 13th, 2023, 4:01 pm

For most people, JKR's reputation was hurt more by the Fantastic Beast movies than anything else!

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6636
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Dacey » April 13th, 2023, 4:26 pm

Not really.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25334
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Ben » April 13th, 2023, 4:37 pm

Max *is* hilariously poor as a name, especially with the filled in O from the HBO leftovers.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 5199
Joined: September 27th, 2007

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by EricJ » April 14th, 2023, 7:58 am

They could be cool and call it "The Maxx", but then we'd just be picturing that pretentious MTV cartoon.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25334
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Ben » April 14th, 2023, 10:59 am

Relax, Max! ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10012
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Daniel » April 14th, 2023, 1:31 pm

Zany to the Max!

AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7270
Joined: October 23rd, 2004
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Randall » April 15th, 2023, 2:57 pm

Extra confusing for us here, as our TV service from the phone company is also called MaxTV, but people mostly just refer to it as "Max."

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25334
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Ben » April 15th, 2023, 8:18 pm

Yeah, we have a SkyMax channel here too, which natch just gets called Max. Even more confusingly, it often shows some of the programmes from Sky Atlantic, which combines content from Showtime and HBO, so we’ll get a bunch of WB-owned shows on the Max channel here which isn’t actually the actual Max.

The issue is that it isn’t a brand name. Even Peacock is a nickname for NBC because of its logo. Paramount is known as The Mountain, but Paramount+ makes more sense. Max is just such a lame non-name, they’d have been better off going with the established brand and a still fairly boring WB+ that at least would have been clear as to what it was (the Discovery bit being the plus).

I give it until Crimbo, if not before, until it gets another rebrand.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 5199
Joined: September 27th, 2007

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by EricJ » April 16th, 2023, 5:17 am

The only possible reason I can see for "Max" was to legally get "HBO" out of the name--
I'm sure we'll hear more about that later on...

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25334
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Re: Harry Potter and the Wizarding World

Post by Ben » April 16th, 2023, 11:58 am

There was no reason to keep or lose the HBO name. They used it in the first place because it was an established "quality" subscription brand. The likelihood is that they would have kept it if they hadn’t wanted to sound "new" because Discovery was now lumped in. Bet you that they just couldn’t come up with a new name: Warner Bros. Discovery Max, or even Plus, is a mouthful, so I reckon they just dropped anything that was leaning either way and just ended up with the pointless, non-associated Max. HBO is actually remaining as branding for HBO shows, so there’s nothing "legal" about that either.

The pointless new name is just like Disney's service, or most others for that matter, just being called Plus, haha!

Post Reply