Meg wrote:Hey, it's a movie based on a book. It's not supposed to be EXACTLY THE SAME. There were changes that had to be made.
Plus, considering that the original Chicken Little story was so short and fluffy, do you really think that material that could easily pad out a 10 minute short doesn't need altering for a 90 minute film?
-Joe
[i]GIRL: Do you know the way to the Magic Kingdom?
PETER PAN: Sure I do...but can you [b]fly?[/b][/i]
-Scary Disney World TV ad circa '71
[b][url=http://www.dvdaficionado.com/dvds.html?cat=1&sub=All&id=big_joe]My DVD List[/url][/b]
I didnt mean use the exact story all over again, its a follow up. Why not just leave out foxy. I mean if the kids decide to read the original book theyll be a bit dissapointed dont you think? Plus I think it would have been funny 2 have a short mention of the king, have him be elvis of some thing to that effect. Chicken little was certainly a desprate film, changes could have been made
Last edited by Lino on January 19th, 2006, 7:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lino wrote:A bit on topic here, Eisner kept switching Cl to boy then girl, and the orignal plot involved a linch mob.
No.
Sheesh I wonder how long that one lasted, anyway if you look around theres a female CL image floating around.... looks like a cross-dressing tweety bird, you'll know it when you see it.
The making of book has images of Girl Chicken Little. And the dvd will have some actual footage in the extras.