Flushed Away

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6800
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

Meg wrote:Sweet! My sister won a copy of the soundtrack! :D
Cool.

Looks like "Flushed Away" is still doing strong business:

http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25986
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben »

Cool...looks like it could be Aardman's biggest hit yet if it stays on track. A lot of competition coming up tho...
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6800
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

DANCING PENGUINS!!!
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
Meg
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 4:55 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg »

Darn those dancing penguins! Always making life difficult for everybody...
User avatar
Daniel
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006, 4:53 pm

Post by Daniel »

:lol: aint it the truth Meg ;)
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6800
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

Seriously, though, I wonder if this means that DreamWorks and Aardman might end up staying together after all.

I also wonder if Mr. Paul Allen is really going to sell his shares.
User avatar
ShyViolet
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9123
Joined: October 25th, 2004, 9:53 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet »

Seriously, though, I wonder if this means that DreamWorks and Aardman might end up staying together after all.
Well, apparently THAT ain't gonna happen.... :roll:

Oh well. I guess they had their reasons. Their styles are so different anyway. And although Chicken Run did quite well (plus it had a DreamWorks screenwriter on it) I think the Aardman British style IS just too different to appeal to the masses, NOT that this means its bad--on the contrary, the fact that it's "different" is what makes it better than 99.9% of entertainment out there... :roll:

But still, this is a business....sad but true. :(


From the TAG blog: (Kevin Koch)
From what I've been hearing, the "divorce" (if it really is that) between DW and Aardman has been brewing for many months, and has much more to do with the difficulties on the collaboration on Tortise v. Hare (a cancelled project) and the protracted production of Flushed Away. I don't think it really has much to do with the financial performance of Flushed Away, which is actually better than anyone's projections.
I suspected that it had to do with Tortoise vs. Hare...really sad that it never got off the ground. Maybe the concept was flawed anyway? Too bad but....watching the Wallace and Gromit film (which I enjoyed) I can see how there'd be clashes since the "cheekiness" and dry British wit, not to mention the "softness" of W & G compared to the hard edges of the average American smart-aleck toon are worlds apart. I suspect that even in Britain, where I'm sure W & G is very popular, there are lots of people who don't care for them either....it's not just the "British" thing, it's a certain taste, and it doesn't appeal to everyone.

Darn those dancing penguins! Always making life difficult for everybody...
So true...I'm sorry to say it but I have absolutely no desire to see Happy Feet, Surf's Up or any other cartoon with these guys...dancing Penguins is a really old concept anyway, didn't they used to have them in those old commercials from thirty years ago?

You know what's original though? Commando Penguins! :P Who get drunk on egg nog....:)
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25986
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben »

ShyViolet wrote:
Seriously, though, I wonder if this means that DreamWorks and Aardman might end up staying together after all.
Well, apparently THAT ain't gonna happen.... :roll:
???

Has this now been officially confirmed?
User avatar
ShyViolet
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9123
Joined: October 25th, 2004, 9:53 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet »

It sort of seemed that way from the article, but I guess things could still change. I hope.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
User avatar
Groaning
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 213
Joined: October 4th, 2006, 1:08 pm
Contact:

Post by Groaning »

ShyViolet wrote:It sort of seemed that way from the article, but I guess things could still change. I hope.
No way. They are going to split up. For sure.
[img]http://www.pixarplanet.com/images/rat.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25986
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben »

Which article?
Meg
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 4:55 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg »

So true...I'm sorry to say it but I have absolutely no desire to see Happy Feet, Surf's Up or any other cartoon with these guys
I'm actually looking foward to both films...But I like the Madagascar penguins could easily get very old very quick.
User avatar
Josh
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 3197
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:29 pm

Post by Josh »

Ben wrote:Which article?
I think Violet means this one in Variety: "An Aard-knock life".
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6800
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

But that article does NOT confirm the split.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25986
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben »

That's why I questioned it. There's nothing official out there.
Post Reply