AV's Best Of The Year Review

Updates, Announcements and Your Feedback
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10075
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » February 7th, 2009, 2:09 pm

Hence why it is under header "The Un-Mentionables: Worst Of 2007". ;)

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25631
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » February 7th, 2009, 3:30 pm

Tinker Bell we found so-so, hence no particular good or bad inclusion. We wanted to highlight a DTV release but Justice League was the natural choice here.

The Sword In The Stone release was not as good as had come before, swapping out good content for a lame game and was indicative of Disney's newer reissues, so it got a bad rap. Ariel's Beginning we did indeed find to be the most pointless, cheap and nasty DTV of the year, so it got lumped in with the rotten eggs.


Good catch, Dan...swapped 2007 for 2008 - the result of my using last year's template! Silly me - but no one else noticed! ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1471
Joined: October 7th, 2007
Location: Unknown

Post by Once Upon A Dream » February 7th, 2009, 3:57 pm

Oh,I see.
And Daniel,only now I noticed that title :oops:.
Sword In The Stone does looks like a bad release but Ariel's Beginning is great,in any case it's not as awful as you described it,if you said that on Little Mermaid II then I whould think that you should say worse things.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25631
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » December 22nd, 2009, 12:07 pm

It's that time of year again, when we here at Animated Views present our rundown of the best and worst! Our Best Of 2009 is now up for your perusal:

http://animated-views.com/2009/the-best ... -personal/


Do you agree with the lists? What failed to make the cut that should have? Did we include something that you feel is overpraised?

WHAT ARE <I>YOUR</I> ANIMATED VIEWS? :)

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 3197
Joined: October 22nd, 2004

Post by Josh » December 22nd, 2009, 8:50 pm

I greatly enjoyed the 'Best of 2009' report. :)

James, you've convinced me to see Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, since you placed it above Coraline and The Princess and the Frog. After being letdown by Meltdown, I had zero interest in another Ice Age movie. But I'm definitely going to check it out now.

Also, I agree with your pick for the worst title of 2009, Ben. I feel Koch Vision was very disrespectful toward Fleischer Studios, with its handling of the Gulliver's Travels Blu-ray.

AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7352
Joined: October 23rd, 2004
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Post by Randall » December 22nd, 2009, 9:49 pm

I saw Ice Age 3, and was still surprised at James' choice (I was lukewarm on it), but it is miles ahead on The Meltdown. (I did still purchase it on Blu-ray, as it was well worth the $9.99 Amazon was selling it for on Black Friday.) For myself, I loved Coraline, but James felt the plot too messy. One thing's certain--- it was a tremendous year for animated films. Even films like MVA and 9 have their merits and would have been discussed much more in any other year.

AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 8270
Joined: October 16th, 2004
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Post by James » December 22nd, 2009, 10:28 pm

I'm a pretty big stickler on story. I like it to be solid, crisp, and tight. Looser more freeform storytelling has to be extra good and not messy or muddled or it turns me off. Coraline was maybe one of the top two beautiful films of the year, but I thought the story was a little too sloppy and episodic. Princess and the Frog had some great musical numbers but outside of those it was a little slow and plodding, and it was just trying too hard. Ice Age 3, while maybe not possessing as much artistic merit as those two, just had a more consistent story. There's hardly a minute that isn't fun or exciting. The story has a solid goal and marches towards it with purpose. The characters and their motivations and actions seem realistic (for their world). And other than the Scrat storyline (which is great for so many other reasons) there is hardly any unnecessary fluff. IA3 had more going for it than that, but Coraline and Princess had a lot going for them too. It was mainly story that made this decision.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: January 23rd, 2006
Location: The Middle of Nowhere

Post by eddievalient » December 22nd, 2009, 11:38 pm

Ben, one nitpick: Jim Henson produced Sam and Friends as a small, five-minute black-and-white show for a local Washington DC station years before Sesame Street was conceived. Just thought I'd point that out.

Also, I think that Battle For Terra ought to have gotten an honorable mention somewhere. Yes, it flopped, but I feel that that's because of the general public's resistance to sci-fi animation in general (case in point: Titan A.E. Entertaining film, but not a major success). I thought BFT actually had a decent story and the ending packed at least a little bit of an emotional punch.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25631
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » December 23rd, 2009, 6:51 am

Josh - you should have seen us going back and forth over P&TF vs IA3 for that third spot. It was actually much better than the second film (as my Blu-ray review also states) but interestingly it didn't make our disc-based top ten, though that's perhaps more for the lacklustre bonus package.

I agree with James on Coraline in that the story was a bit to and fro to the same elements all the time, though animation being a visual medium I might have gone for that too. Still, nice to see Mr Fox get a nod, since I did think that was one of the most original animated films of recent times, so yay for stop-motion!


Eddie - we can naturally only comment on what we've seen, so Terra wasn't an option. On Sam And Friends...oops!! I meant Land Of Gorch! Always getting those mixed up - thanks for the pointer, it's been changed! :)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 38
Joined: July 23rd, 2006
Location: Yuma, Arizona USA
Contact:

Post by William » December 24th, 2009, 7:51 pm

Should have mentioned Ponyo, but that's just me as a Miyazaki fanatic...

AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 7352
Joined: October 23rd, 2004
Location: SaskaTOON, Canada

Post by Randall » December 25th, 2009, 1:16 am

Again, I think it was mostly an issue that we hadn't seen Ponyo. I almost caught it in theatres here, but unfortunately missed it. We'll certainly be reviewing the Blu-ray, though.

American_dog_2008

Post by American_dog_2008 » December 25th, 2009, 1:38 pm

I would had placed Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs on #1.

A shame those classic cartoons DVD ain't in my country.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 76
Joined: February 18th, 2009

Post by Aaron_03 » December 27th, 2009, 4:17 am

Daniel wrote:I completely agree with Cinderella III: A Twist in Time's inclusion in to the top 10! Yay!

As for Cinderella II: Dreams Come True, well, it got what it deserved... Still like it, though! :)
:D Completely agree.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25631
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » December 29th, 2009, 9:37 am

Um...guys...those Cinderellas were in <I>last</I> year's lists! ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 277
Joined: May 16th, 2007
Location: India

Post by Jafar » January 27th, 2010, 10:10 am

I would've so loved to see "Mary and Max" in there. My most favourite of 2009.

Nice and interesting read, nevertheless.

Post Reply