Ghostbusters — OFFICIAL THREAD

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
EricJ
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 5212
Joined: September 27th, 2007, 3:06 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by EricJ »

So what if Paul Feig complained about the "Ghostbusters Trilogy" disc boxset that came out after Afterlife?

(Well, either leave out the '16 version or leave out Ghostbusters II, it's a tough call...)
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

I think you said it there yourself: he complained about the Ghostbusters Trilogy box set.

His film wasn’t included because, a) it does not take place in the Reitmanverse, and b) it is total crap. No, GBII isn’t always great, but it sets things up that still come into play in Afterlife. And it’s still more vastly entertaining than the 2016 anomaly, which clearly takes place in a world where Venkman, Stantz and Spengler didn’t exist.

So, yeah, Trilogy. The next one would be a fourth entry in that canon.
User avatar
Daniel
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006, 4:53 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Daniel »

Actually, Paul's complaint was for the "Ultimate Collection".
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

That’s what I meant. It contained the GB trilogy…!
gaastra
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 2932
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 3:40 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by gaastra »

gaastra
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 2932
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 3:40 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by gaastra »

User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

"We got one!!" :D
User avatar
Daniel
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006, 4:53 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Daniel »

Logo for the sequel:

Image

Hell freezes over maybe..?
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

Me likey.
User avatar
Daniel
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006, 4:53 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Daniel »

Concept art. (Spoilery) Shows the big bad. Looks cool!
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

Now that’s a big Twinkie!

After the disappointment of Bat-Flash and the sure to be sucky-sucky-Indy, my hopes rest with Ghostbusters to get the modern nostalgia fest right. Given the last film and where they are going with it, this is potentially awesome.
User avatar
Daniel
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006, 4:53 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Daniel »

Set photos:

Image

Walter Peck!
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

Just what is Paul Rudd wearing under that jacket…? :? ;)
gaastra
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 2932
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 3:40 pm

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by gaastra »

Delayed to next year thanks to strike.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie ... 235547084/
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25994
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Ghostbusters III - OFFICIAL THREAD

Post by Ben »

Prob for the best. It all felt a bit rushed trying to make it for this Christmas. Absolutely no surprise Spideyverse 3 got pushed back…it hasn’t even finished being written (as a final script), let alone voice recorded.
Post Reply