Charlotte's Web

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25973
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Charlotte's Web

Post by Ben »

Couldn't find we had a thread on this...so I made one (all by myself)! :)

Actually, it was Mac's love for the Treasure Planet score that got me going on this...it's used again in the teaser for Charlotte's Web:

http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2006/ ... railer.php

...as well as a little Scissorhands (can't go wrong with that ever). Have to say, I wasn't impressed - the audio sync is off, maing the animation look poor, and frankly I'd rather have seen some of the STORY as opposed to merely being run off a bunch of names and having to sit through the joke of one line - and in some cases one word! - being sprouted by said actors' characters.

Sorry, but this put me right off. I don't need to see another "Babe" movie! ;)
Meg
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 4:55 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg »

I keep thinking of that line in one of the Freakazoid episodes..."That is one cute pig."

As for me, I think I'll stick with the animated version. This looks like a cross between Babe and (shudder) Racing Stripes. Hopefully this will turn out better than what the trailer points to.

Ugh, big celebrity names...Heeeelp...
User avatar
ShyViolet
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9122
Joined: October 25th, 2004, 9:53 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet »

One word: yuck. :?
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
User avatar
Brandon Neeld
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 376
Joined: August 10th, 2005, 10:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Brandon Neeld »

I'll admit, the trailer is actually alot better than what I was expecting... of course, then again, I wasn't expecting very much. ;)

Personal Annoyances...
1) Too many big names
2) Dakota Fanning *blech* though admittedly just in the trailer I think her quality was a huge step up from WotW, but then again she didn't have any other direction to go.
3) Don't get me wrong I love Steve Bucemi but Paul Lynde WAS Templeton. I was hoping he'd at least try to bring back some of that persona in Templeton but instead he seems to be completely reinventing the character. I felt like I was watching Stuart Little.
"We're Dead! We're Dead! We Survived but We're Dead!!!" -Dash- "The Incredibles"
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6793
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

Haven't watched the trailer yet. I have trouble getting these things working on my computer.

However, I will say that Dakota Fanning sounds like choice casting, as does Steve Bucemi.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25973
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben »

Brandon Neeld wrote:I was hoping Steve Bucemi would at least try to bring back some of that persona in Templeton but instead he seems to be completely reinventing the character.
Yeah, he's completely reinventing the character so it sounds like Steve Buscemi (as usual)! ;)
Meg
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 4:55 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg »

Dokota Fanning...Ugh. She needs to like, stop being in movies for a little while. If there's a movie starring a little girl, you can bet that girl is Dakota Fanning.
User avatar
Lindsay
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 45
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:29 pm
Location: West Saint Paul, MN
Contact:

Post by Lindsay »

As a huge fan of Babe, and also having watched the Hanna-Barbera Charlotte's Web a ton when I was young, I definitely concur with the majority opinion here... bleah. It looks way too "Hollywood-ized" - too many celebrity names thrown around; I mean, even the bit parts have celebrity voices! O_o And Dakota Fanning as Fern... uh, not really, no. It may just be a case of Fanning overexposure, but I'm awfully tired of the kid by now. :?

Unless we see some more promising trailers and other promotions for this film before Christmas, I'm passing on this one.
Movie-Man
Banned
Banned
Posts: 147
Joined: April 17th, 2006, 8:11 pm

Post by Movie-Man »

This is going to end up in the IMDB 100 bottom list.
User avatar
eddievalient
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: January 23rd, 2006, 5:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Nowhere

Post by eddievalient »

I can't believe it. For once I agree with Movie Man. I never cared much for the animated movie, so I don't think the live action one will be much better.
User avatar
Ben
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25973
Joined: October 22nd, 2004, 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben »

I actually think Movie Man is agreeing with all of us! ;)
Movie-Man
Banned
Banned
Posts: 147
Joined: April 17th, 2006, 8:11 pm

Post by Movie-Man »

Ben wrote:I actually think Movie Man is agreeing with all of us! ;)
Well I never like Charlotte's Web anyway especially Dakota Fanning, don't like her but from what I seen, this is going to be the next Son of the Mask.
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6793
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

Oh, c'mon, it won't be THAT bad. Seriously.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
Movie-Man
Banned
Banned
Posts: 147
Joined: April 17th, 2006, 8:11 pm

Post by Movie-Man »

Wendy's Jane wrote:Oh, c'mon, it won't be THAT bad. Seriously.
Then how do you explain the bad reaction to the trailer? Charlotte's Web might become the next Son of the Mask.
User avatar
Dacey
AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6793
Joined: February 8th, 2005, 5:54 pm
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey »

Yes, but even if it gets a bad reaction, it seems quite unlikely that it will be as detested as "Son of the Mask" was.

Besides, I'm sure that kids will like it.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
Post Reply