Harry Potter and the Wizarding World
Re: Harry Potter
It's already established that this is the next story in the saga. The play and the script book (and the eventual film) are billed as "the eighth story", so there's no getting away from that fact, Bill...!
Re: Harry Potter
Lalala...I can't hear you Ben. LOL
Re: Harry Potter

I haven't seen it yet, and I'm in London! In fact I've passed the Palace Theatre several times since it opened and keep thinking I should book up. But then I am actually happy just to read the book and wait for the movies...
Re: Harry Potter
I was interested in it too, until I heard it was just a "Time-travel alternate universe" story such as the kind that Star Trek and Marvel Comics routinely pump out when they get too wrapped up in their own fandoms.Ben wrote:
I haven't seen it yet, and I'm in London! In fact I've passed the Palace Theatre several times since it opened and keep thinking I should book up. But then I am actually happy just to read the book and wait for the movies...
Which would tend to support some of the fans' angry reaction to the book novelization as "Bad fan-fiction".
(When Star Trek: Deep Space Nine kept bringing the bad-character "Mirror universe" in as a running plotline, I sort of knew what to expect from this one...
Cursed hasn't exactly re-opened a story JK already closed, not that she's too concerned about the petty technicalities of that.)
Re: Harry Potter
There's been no "novelization of the play." All that's been published is the play itself.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
Re: Harry Potter
Thank you, Warrior Nitpicker. You have done your duty in discrediting the Bad Person with micro-shaming.Dacey wrote:There's been no "novelization of the play." All that's been published is the play itself.

Okay, "Which would tend to support some of the fans' angry reaction to the published play as 'Bad fan-fiction'."
Re: Harry Potter
He meant "novelization" in that the script has been "bookified"!


Re: Harry Potter
Except it hasn't...it's just a nicely hard-bound version of the script!



Re: Harry Potter
Yes, "bookified" in that the script has been "boundificated"!




Re: Harry Potter
I wouldn't be surprised if that was the spell they used, yes.





Re: Harry Potter
scripto boundificus!



















Re: Harry Potter
I see your...



Stupify!!
...and raise youJames wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()






















































Stupify!!
Re: Harry Potter
As the wise man once said:

(And we're having so much fun with our smileys, I won't even bring up the "Is Albus Potter just ripping off Kylo Ren?" theory among the core fans who read the play.)



(And we're having so much fun with our smileys, I won't even bring up the "Is Albus Potter just ripping off Kylo Ren?" theory among the core fans who read the play.)
Re: Harry Potter
JK Rowling's editor didn't allow swearing in the books (all it said in the books was "character" swore but no words)
JK Rowling said that Ron would swear.
I wonder if that's the reason why Crabbe and Goyle don't talk much except for when Harry and Ron use the polyjuice potion and when they would cast spells.
JK Rowling said that Ron would swear.
I wonder if that's the reason why Crabbe and Goyle don't talk much except for when Harry and Ron use the polyjuice potion and when they would cast spells.